Search for: "Ventura v. Ventura" Results 261 - 280 of 371
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Richard Zorza
Thank you to all who posted for a spectacularly worthwhile and open conversation about Turner v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:15 am
In fact, Ventura County officials were the first to learn of the problem in April. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST LAKEWOOD, CO… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST LAKEWOOD, CO… [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:57 pm by Jaya Ramji-Nogales
No one knows what the Supreme Court will do in Turner v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Likewise, defendant's fifth and sixth counterclaims have "no merit" because defendant failed to either rebut plaintiff's proof that the retainer agreement was legally sufficient or specify any legal theory upon which relief could potentially be granted (Ventura v Fischer, 21 Misc 3d 131[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 52124[U], *2 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008]; see CPLR 3212 [b]). [*3] Finally, the District Court should have dismissed the seventh and eighth… [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:18 am
Palo Alto police have used the devices and authorities in Ventura County are also reviewing hundreds of the cases. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:18 am
Palo Alto police have used the devices and authorities in Ventura County are also reviewing hundreds of the cases. [read post]
9 May 2011, 10:24 pm by Michael DelSignore
They stopped this month after discovering that Ventura County authorities were reviewing hundreds of cases for errors. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:07 pm
But the review in San Jose originated after crime lab officials, prosecutors and police in Ventura County began reviewing hundreds of similar cases in recent weeks. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:07 pm
But the review in San Jose originated after crime lab officials, prosecutors and police in Ventura County began reviewing hundreds of similar cases in recent weeks. [read post]
7 May 2011, 8:15 am
Recently, San Jose officers stopped using the device after six months, while Ventura County authorities began reviewing hundreds of similar cases in the last few weeks. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:18 am by Lawrence Taylor
County crime lab officials, prosecutors and police began looking into the breathalyzers after discovering that Ventura County authorities began reviewing hundreds of similar cases more than a week ago. [read post]