Search for: "Viacom Inc"
Results 261 - 280
of 470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am
Phoenix International Software, Inc. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:40 am
For previous IPKat reports on the battle click here.Viacom v YouTube: Viacom's appeal argumentsFollowing YouTube's summary judgment success in the Viacom litigation last year it was no surprise that Viacom, supported by several amici curiae, would appeal Judge Stanton’s June summary judgment (here and reported here). [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:38 pm
Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court C D California: For divided infringement, proof of agency not required to establish ‘direction and control’: Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:28 am
However, it was noted in Viacom Int'l Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am
The People) Viacom – Viacom, FAPL and Amici File briefs in Viacom v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:39 am
http://tinyurl.com/22uc2rx (Jon Rowe) WikiLeaks 'Hactivists' Target Fax Machines - http://tinyurl.com/2etw86x (Matthew Schwartz) Vendor Views Industry Landscape AccessData Releases SilentRunner™ Mobile - http://tinyurl.com/25gz8fr (Business Wire) Complete Discovery Source, Inc. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
The lawsuit was filed on Thurday in Arizona District Court against Family Edited DVDS, Inc. and its leader, John Webster, who’ve taken movies such as Iron Man 2, The Hurt Locker, Prince of Persia and Date Night, altered them to be free of objectionable content, and distributes them to consumers as “family-friendly. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
In a suit by Viacom against YouTube, where Viacom was alleging damages of $1 billion for copyright infringement because YouTube was not taking any measure (or not taking sufficient measures) to discourage illegal posting of material onto its website, Judge Stanton threw out the lawsuit, stating that the DMCA did not require YouTube to check material before it posted the material on its website. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
Viacom v YouTube: Two weeks ago, as expected (so expected, the AmeriKat adds, that she didn't even think it was news), Viacom filed their appeal in the Viacom v YouTube case in the appeals court in New York (see previous AmeriKat posts on the case here). [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:57 am
http://tinyurl.com/27vx2r6 (Sixto Ortiz) Review of FTC's Proposed Privacy Framework - Part 1 -http://tinyurl.com/36r967h (Richard Santalesa) Self-Collection Prohibited in Delaware - http://tinyurl.com/23crznm (Christopher Spizzirri) The Changing Landscape of eDisclosure - http://tinyurl.com/23gz45r (Craig Carpenter) Top 7 Legal Things to Know about Cloud, SaaS and eDiscovery - http://tinyurl.com/2awr5m9 (David Morris, James Shook) Viacom Appeals Ruling Favoring YouTube, Says it… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:19 am
Any YouTube user who hasn't been living under a digital rock has run across the not-uncommon "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by XYZ Inc. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm
DMCA Notices: BayTSP DMCA (Copyright) Complaint to Google; From: Viacom International Inc., Atom Entertainment, Inc., Black Entertainment Television L To: Google, Inc. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm
Viacom Inc. says a new wave of digital piracy could threaten the U.S. media business unless federal courts overturn its defeat in a copyright-infringement lawsuit against Google Inc. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:30 am
The Viacom Int'l Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:06 pm
See IpVenture, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 10:04 am
The case is WPIX Inc v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:24 pm
Credit: Original by Arnob Alam Last week, Caitlin Sanchez, the voice of Dora the Explorer, sued MTV Networks and Nickelodeon/Viacom Consumer Products, Inc. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:24 pm
Credit: Original by Arnob Alam Last week, Caitlin Sanchez, the voice of Dora the Explorer, sued MTV Networks and Nickelodeon/Viacom Consumer Products, Inc. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
§ 101 et seq. as well as common law breach of contract claims against Defendants Steven Spielberg; DW Studios, LLC; Paramount Pictures Corporation; Viacom, Inc.; NBC Universal, Inc.; Universal Pictures Company, Inc.; Universal City Studios, LLP; United International Pictures, B.V.; and Does 1-10,[1] alleging that the motion picture Disturbia — a film produced by Spielberg, owner of DW Studios, LLC, which is in turn a wholly-owned subsidiary of Paramount… [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:07 pm
AUTODESK, INC., 2010 Technology & Marketing Law Blog: Vernor v. [read post]
