Search for: "W. T. Grant Co., in Re" Results 261 - 280 of 733
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2016, 4:45 am by Ron Coleman
Right — so long as the trademark in question is THE trademark under which they’re doing business, that is. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 8:38 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
The trial court denied that request, but did grant defense summary judgment, finding it had complied with requisite warning label requirements and the product wasn’t unreasonably dangerous. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  They will formulate a test to achieve the result they are interested in w/r/t fashion industry in general. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  This can’t possibly be consistent w/Dastar’s rejection of “mutant copyright. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:41 am by Ron Coleman
The Court therefore grants Tiffany’s moti [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm by Jared Beck
 While immunity was extended during Watergate to two top Nixon officials, John W. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am by Dennis Crouch
  In re TC Heartland, LLC, No. 2016-105, at 10 (Fed. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm by Dennis Crouch
”); In re Comiskey, 554 F.3d 967, 973 (Fed. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm by MBettman
In re Hua, 62 Ohio St.2d 227 (1980) (Ohio Due Course of Law provision coextensive with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.) [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 12:41 pm by Laura Dean
“[W]orse than the slums of Mumbai” proclaimed a recent Guardian article. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Boundary crossing: sharing research w/community at large v. within the pharma co. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
  If Helen Weste had the capacity to live alone and care for herself, she had the capacity to make a [w]ill.Judge Ciuffani noted that "[t]he case law clearly states that the threshold for testamentary capacity is very low, one need only possess a very [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 8:21 pm by Steve Kalar
Surely these loan misstatements aren’t “material,” when made to lenders who were effectively co-conspirators? [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
But it really only affects our work when the Justices decide not to decide because they’re worried they won’t be able to decide. [read post]