Search for: "WALKER v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 261 - 280
of 747
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 12:01 am
There was lots of news coverage, including at NPR, about the hearing yesterday morning on the motion to vacate the decision of USDC Judge Vaughn Walker in the same sex marriage litigation in California. [read post]
Lead Agencies Are Not Always Required to Explain Why Every Proposed Mitigation Measure is Infeasible
15 Aug 2011, 10:47 am
Walker In Santa Clarita Organization for Planning the Environment v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 1:59 pm
Walker On April 17, 2009, the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 10:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:01 pm
The certified question issue has now been docketed at the California Supreme Court, under case number S189476, Perry v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 7:08 am
Bedoya v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm
John Monahan, Laurens Walker and Gregory Mitchell. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:10 am
And Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Walker v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 10:36 am
His observation are particularly timely in light of the recent decision of a district court judge in Perry v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 7:43 am
” (Bush v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:50 am
On August 4, 2010, the decision was reached in Perry et al v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
The ‘323 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Walker Digital v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
Pennsylvania, 13-885; Walker v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:33 pm
Plaintiffs in Perry v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:00 pm
In a decision June 26 in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:37 am
Walker, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law and Melissa F. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:18 am
The SCOTUS heard oral arguments yesterday in Rowe v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 2:54 pm
Two updates on Yamagiwa v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm
When Federal District Judge Vaughn Walker, presiding over the Proposition 8 trial, asked the lawyer for the gay couples challenging California’s ban on same-sex marriage whether the danger was “not that you’re going to lose this case, either here or at the Court of Appeals or at the Supreme Court, but that you might win it,” the judge was making reference to Roe v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 8:20 am
Id.As previously discussed here, Judge Claudia Wilken similarly declined to follow Avritt in Greenwood v. [read post]
