Search for: "WATER POWER v. Human Rights"
Results 261 - 280
of 617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
In other words, Klarman aims to show us that the Constitution is a merely human document constructed by historically situated actors who were not immune from familiar human frailties and limitations. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
The case of Conforti v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
Currently, Washington, DC’s alphabet agencies are operating overtime – the Department of Health and Human Services regulating healthcare, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau imposing the Dodd-Frank Act, the EPA setting global warming standards, and on and on. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:16 am
The “equitable relief” power under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 8:26 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:36 am
See Southeastern Promotions v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:09 am
People who are strong advocates of IP rights are often antitrust skeptics and vice versa. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Ed. 2d 153 (2013) (joined opinion) “water compact insulated states’ water statutes from dormant Commerce Clause challenge insofar as challenge applied to surface water subject to that compact” United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
On November 10, 2016, Judge Ann Aiken, a federal district judge in Oregon, issued a remarkable environmental law decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right.[1] Juliana v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
On November 10, 2016, a federal district judge in Oregon issued a remarkable decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right.[1] Juliana v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
On November 10, 2016, Judge Ann Aiken, a federal district judge in Oregon, issued a remarkable environmental law decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right.[1] Juliana v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
On November 10, 2016, Judge Ann Aiken, a federal district judge in Oregon, issued a remarkable environmental law decision in which she found that a climate system “capable of sustaining human life” is a fundamental constitutional right.[1] Juliana v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
PUSSY POWER rejected for entertainment, but PUSSY POWER REVOLUTION for clothing. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:39 pm
Among those so excluded have been aliens whose actions “threaten the peace, security, or stability of Libya”; officials of the North Korean government; and aliens responsible for “serious human rights violations. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:24 am
Notably, as we describe below, Argentina filed a counterclaim in the case, alleging that the investors had violated their obligations in relation to the human right to water, and claiming compensation of US$191 million. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Bautista-Silva, Pryor wrote a majority decision rejecting a Fourth Amendment challenge to a traffic stop leading to an arrest for human trafficking. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 8:14 am
Glennon and Sloane play this as a refrain: if a state risked offending a foreign power, Congress could always act to make things right. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am
That means that longstanding precedent, such as Roe v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:33 am
Justice Black’s opinion in Afroyim v. [read post]
