Search for: "WEEKS v. DAVIS" Results 261 - 280 of 1,975
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In an essay for this website a few weeks ago, my fellow columnist and friend Mike Dorf wrote about how the Obamacare statute (Act) might be in danger in the King v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:08 am by Staci Zaretsky
[National Law Journal] Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Arizona, Attorney Misconduct, Barack Obama, Biglaw, Clifford Sloan, Crime, Davis Polk, Davis Polk & Wardwell, Edward Snowden, Election Law, Federal Trade Commission, FTC, FTC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:31 pm by Vandenack Weaver LLC
By Matthew Dunning Earlier this week the United States Supreme Court issued its unanimous opinion in Fort Bend County, Texas v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 8:37 am
This month the excitement (if you can call it that) shifted to Tyler where Judges Davis and Love have been trying patent cases simultaneously beginning last week. [read post]
24 May 2011, 4:15 pm by Michael C. Smith
  It's been a rough few weeks over in Judge Davis' chambers from the looks of things. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:55 pm by Lyle Denniston
Although the Supreme Court in late June, in the case of Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am by James Bickford
  At PrawfsBlawg, Miriam Baer comments on Thursday’s seven-two decision in Davis v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:07 am by J
Lynch v Kirby, QBD, 28.1.10 before Nicola Davies QC sitting as a Deputy Judge is - according to Casetrack - in the process of being written up. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:07 am by J
Lynch v Kirby, QBD, 28.1.10 before Nicola Davies QC sitting as a Deputy Judge is - according to Casetrack - in the process of being written up. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:42 am
This week on the legal-affairs podcast Lawyer2Lawyer, we discuss the recent Supreme Court decision Sprint/United Management Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 7:13 am
Davis, summarized in this Feb. 28th ILB entry titled "Court of Appeals rules no duty to clear adjacent public sidewalks. [read post]