Search for: "Wales v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
On the issue of justiciability of the claim based on infringement of United States copyright, the Court had this to say: "87. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
The guiding principle in Scots law is Lawrie v Muir 1950 JC 19, which states that an irregularity in the method by which evidence has been obtained does not necessarily make that evidence inadmissible in a criminal prosecution [17]. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Elgizouli v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] 2 WLR 857 The case concerns the UK’s stance on the application of mutual legal assistance to the United States where doing so may result in the death penalty being carried out. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
United States As mentioned above, the US Senate has voted in favour of legislation that could ban TikTok in the country if its Chinese owners refuse to sell. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:56 am by Liz Williams
  He says that is not something on which there is a margin of appreciation to the state. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 4:33 am
Frost Products Ltd v F C Frost Ltd  [2013] EWPCC 34 (Patents County Court, England and Wales) is a decision of Mr Justice Vos from 26 July 2013. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Article 23 of the draft NIS Directive states that “Member States shall ensure that the TLD registries and the entities providing domain name registration services for the TLD publish, without undue delay after the registration of a domain name, domain registration data which are not personal data. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:56 am
Elvis Presley Enterprises v Carollo (trading as Everness) is a decision of Sir William Blackburne, a retired judge sitting in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
Would this be an appropriate case for a defence of parody or, in the United States, fair use (and could the facts be forced to fit within the scope of "fair dealing" or any other defences under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988)? [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
 Since 2002 there had been extensive litigation in Canada and the United States arising from a contractual dispute between the two groups. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States Reuters had a piece “Sacha Baron Cohen, Showtime win dismissal of Roy Moore defamation lawsuit”. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 3:58 am by INFORRM
Yang Tengbo was excluded from the United Kingdom in March 2023. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:32 am by Alessandro Cerri
 Section 12 is derived from Art.7 of Directive 89/104/EEC and, at the relevant time, provided that:A registered trade mark is not infringed by the use of the trade mark in relation to goods which have been put on the market in the United Kingdom or the European Economic Area under that trade mark by the proprietor or with his consent. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 5:07 pm
On this basis the Court concluded that the Schauzu publication discloses olanzapine as one of its compounds.In its assessment, the Court took into account the EPO case law on flaws and mistakes in disclosures (T 89/87, T 412/91, T77/87, T 591/90).The Court also admitted that its decision deviated from earlier decisions in the United States, China, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Ukraine, Russia, Germany, United Kingdom, Austria and Spain, giving a brief explanation… [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am by Dave
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]