Search for: "Walters v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 825
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2009, 3:54 am
Forty-six states, the District of Columbia, and the United States all provide some form of DNA testing. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:47 pm
This proved to be true of Britain as well as the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 8:56 am by Earl Drott
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, had diversity jurisdiction over the case. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 6:50 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This was also an issue in the 1892 United States Supreme Court case, Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Shea Denning
A week ago today, I sat in the gallery of the United States Supreme Court with twenty North Carolina district court judges listening to Chief Justice John Roberts announce the court’s opinion in Endrow v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:18 pm by Dawn Johnsen
   Half of all pregnancies in the United States (more than three million a year) are unintended. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the “theme out of the United States Supreme Court [yesterday was] materiality. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:10 am by Walter Weber
Sadly, the United States also experimented with government-imposed racial labeling. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am by Sean Wajert
  Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma pursuant to CAFA, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:30 pm by Karen Gullo
”For the decision:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-appeals-court-rulingFor more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states Contact:  AaronMackeyStaff Attorneyamackey@eff.org [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 11:27 am by WSLL
Thomas Sullins, Judge.Representing Appellant: Walter F. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am by Marty Lederman
With Monday’s filing of the reply briefs by the government and the intervenors, the briefing in the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]