Search for: "Warner Music, Inc." Results 261 - 280 of 373
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 11:21 am by @ErikJHeels
(East Sandwich, MA) Av8 Music Entertainment, Corp. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:16 am by Ken Davidson
EMI, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, and Warner Music Group had also been accused of engaging in pay-for-play practices. [read post]
10 May 2010, 8:55 am by Ken Davidson
On this day in 2000, the FTC announced a settlement of a price-fixing case against the five largest music distributors: Universal Music and Video Distribution (UMVD), Sony Corp. of America, Time Warner Inc., EMI Music Distribution and Bertelsmann Music Group (BMG). [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:37 pm by Sheppard Mullin
 The Defendants in the Starr case include Sony Corp., Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Bertelsmann Inc., Vivendi’s Universal Music Group, Time Warner Inc., Warner Music Group Corp. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 1:08 pm by Jonathan Bailey
It’s also come to light, as was expected, that the takedowns were the product of a bot that tracks MP3s on the Web. 3: Video Site Backed by Time Warner Inc., Eisner to File For Chapter 7 Finally today, we have to say goodbye to an old friend, Veoh. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:51 am by Sheldon Toplitt
District Court for the District of Minnesota has reduced by 97 percent the $1.92 million verdict obtained by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) in June 2009, against a Minnesota woman in the first trial of a P2P infringement case.In Capitol Records, Inc., Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Arista Records, LLC, Interscope Records, Warner Bros. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:23 pm
The court pointed to the plaintiffs’ contention that the defendants—EMI, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Universal Music Group Recordings, Inc., and Warner Music Group Corp. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 12:14 pm
XM previously settled related suits with Universal Music Group and Warner Music Group. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
§ 101 rejections of software-based method claims in light of In re Bilski (FoundPersuasive) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Computerised business method patent fails Bilski test under 35 USC 101: H&R Block Tax Services v Jackson Hewitt Tax Services Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Internet archive website is admissible evidence in touchscreen keyboard patent case: SP Techs, LLC v Garmin Int’l,… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int’l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant’s defences and counterclaims granted in p [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant's defences and counterclaims granted in part; antitrust claims severed: Fiber Systems International v Applied Optical Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion to compel denied - non-compliance with 'meet and confer' rule: Konami Digital Entertainment Co v Harmonix Music (EDTexweblog.com) BPAI used… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak)   United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:32 am
If you want to follow this event, it's Eolas Technologies Inc. v Adobe Systems Inc., et al., No. 6:09-cv-446. [read post]