Search for: "Warner v. WARNER COMPANY" Results 261 - 280 of 923
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
It is possible, for instance, that they were the work of some reputation-management company that connected the plaintiffs and Kelly/Warner, and that the company claimed that it had gotten the documents authentically signed and notarized. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm by Jordan Brunner
  John Bellinger commented that the Alien Tort Statute case Doe v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 9:01 am by Matthew Savage Aibel
Infosys, an IT services company, bid on a job from Time Warner Cable (“TWC”) that had been serviced by a competitor, Acclaim. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 9:01 am by Matthew Savage Aibel
Infosys, an IT services company, bid on a job from Time Warner Cable (“TWC”) that had been serviced by a competitor, Acclaim. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 9:01 am by Matthew Savage Aibel
Infosys, an IT services company, bid on a job from Time Warner Cable (“TWC”) that had been serviced by a competitor, Acclaim. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Ed. 2d 726 (2016) (concurred in opinion) Court’s determination not unreasonable and counsel not deficient Warner v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Nelson, J.D.Shareholders of Time Warner, Inc. allege the company’s board misled them by filing a materially deficient proxy that left out information about how the company calculated certain non-GAAP financial measures related to its proposed acquisition by AT&T Inc. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 3:08 pm by Kit Walsh
Disney and other entertainment companies, including Fox and Warner Brothers, argued that providing this service violates copyright law and the related law against bypassing access controls in Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am by J. Gordon Hylton
In 1943 and 1944, he was an instructor in aeriel navigation and physical education for Naval Officers enrolled at UVA under the V-12 program. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm by Robert Laplaca
In July, the FTC charged Warner Bros. with making inadequate disclosures in videos of influencers playing a new video game. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 9:10 am by Brian Cordery
In addition to seeking to revise the NHS Guidance, Warner-Lambert made a concession to allow generic companies to obtain “intermediate marketing authorisations” whereby they were entitled to extend their authorised indications to include central neuropathic pain (held not to be plausibly disclosed in Warner-Lambert V and Warner-Lambert CA II) but not peripheral neuropathic pain (held to be plausibly disclosed, but without any benefit to the… [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:44 am
Justice Birss’s rulings in Varian Medical Systems AG v (1) Elekta Limited; and (2) Elekta Holdings Limited [2016] EWHC 2679 (Pat) cases. [read post]