Search for: "Warren B. Long" Results 261 - 280 of 431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2013, 9:02 pm by John Dean
  It has been going on so long that it is difficult to discern who fired the first shot and when. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
 But legal academics have spent thirty years disagreeing with that proposition and dreaming up liability schemes designed to force software vendors to shoulder some of the costs long borne entirely by users. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 6:05 am by Steve Vladeck
§§ 1803(b) and 1861(f)(3), the Supreme Court has the ultimate authority to review decisions by the FISA Court, as appealed to the FISA Court of Review. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:31 pm by Ellen D. Katz
Earl Warren would have been astounded. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am by Steve Vladeck
And lest there be any doubt on the subject, the Supreme Court has long understood this very point… As Chief Justice Roberts explained for the Court two years ago in Stern v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:18 am by Daniel Shaviro
(It is already a bit on the long side without including Topic 2, on which in any case I had less to say.)1. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 6:30 am by David Fraser
In that effort, Detective Constable Warren Bulmer has written a couple of guest posts, including the most recent "A police officer's response to my recent critique of lawful access".As I indicated when I posted Warren's piece, I mentioned I'd probably have a response. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 3:52 am by David Fraser
You may recall that on September 18, 2012, Detective Constable Warren Bulmer of the Toronto Police Service's Computer and Technology Facilitated Crime group had a guest post: Guest post: A police officer's take on informational privacy and the police in the digital age. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 10:19 pm by Jeff Gamso
  It's absolutely unambiguous.The Constitution says that the federal government can do A, B, C, and D. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:00 am by David Bernstein
L Rev. 1 (1991); and Barry Cushman, Some Varieties and Vicissitudes of Lochnerism, 85 B. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:44 pm by Abigail Thernstrom
” Shelby County, Alabama, sought a declaratory judgment that both Sections 4(b) and 5 of the Voting Rights Act are facially unconstitutional – Section 4(b) containing the trigger that determines Section 5 coverage of states. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:51 pm by Howard Wasserman
But the leap to connect bad officiating to player safety is a long one that is not obviously warranted, at least not ex ante. [read post]