Search for: "Washington v. Evans" Results 261 - 280 of 494
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 3:01 pm
So holds the Washington Court of Appeals in today’s City of Seattle v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:52 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Washington, DC lawyer David Evans of Chadbourne & Parke on the firm’s blog, TMT Perspectives Halliburton: U.S. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The key decision in this line of authority is the intuitively attractive yet controversial and somewhat confounding 1982 ruling in Washington v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Erickson and the 1982 ruling in Washington v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
Frederick of the Washington, D.C., office of Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, PLLC, with thirty minutes of time. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:14 am by Amy Howe
  In a post for The Volokh Conspiracy (via The Washington Post), Orin Kerr discusses this week’s oral argument in Navarette v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm by Peter Tillers
This right includes 'the right to present the defendant's version of the facts,' Washington v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:39 pm by Ilya Somin
Evans in 1996– which struck down a Colorado voter initiative that abolished antidiscrimination protections based on sexual orientation –to U.S. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:45 pm by Dale Carpenter
Evans and even on Judge Walker’s ruling in the Prop 8 case. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Evidencing Racial Profiling Under the Supreme Court’s 1976 decision in Washington v. [read post]