Search for: "Watkins v. Watkins" Results 261 - 280 of 823
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2021, 5:14 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  Rebekka holds a PhD in Theoretical Physics from the Bonn University.Sven Völcker (Partner, Latham & Watkins):Dr Sven Völcker is a partner in Latham & Watkins' Global Antitrust & Competition Practice. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:43 pm by Madelaine Lane
Watkins, Case No. 142031, which we discussed in a previous post. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:33 pm by Kevin Poulsen
“Childish pranks just don’t have a place anymore,” said Darin Watkins. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:18 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) C, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2578 (04 November 2010) Qazi & Anor, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2579 (04 November 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) HHY Luxembourg Sarl & Anr v Barclays Bank Plc & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1248 (22 October 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Eurocall Ltd v Energis Communications Ltd & Anor [2010] EWHC 2790 (QB) (04 November 2010) Jaison Property Development Co Ltd v… [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:30 am by Kevin Couch
I'm not sure that Otis Watkins and McKinlee Pruett felt the rage that Foster felt, but the named Plaintiffs in Watkins v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:56 am by Lyle Denniston
Garre, now chair of the appellate practice at Latham & Watkins, in Washington. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:57 am by Florian Mueller
Koh's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and remedial ordersJay Jurata (Partner, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe)Licensing practitioner's perspective on fallout from FTC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:22 am
Questions in the Tom Kabinet CJEU reference finalized (at last) | Court of Appeal, following EPO, reverses Carr J in Regeneron v Kymab dispute | Regeneron v Kymab - Part I: Sufficiency | How do you protect patents from judicial and expert hindsight? [read post]
9 May 2018, 8:34 am
Questions in the Tom Kabinet CJEU reference finalized (at last) | Court of Appeal, following EPO, reverses Carr J in Regeneron v Kymab dispute | Regeneron v Kymab - Part I: Sufficiency | How do you protect patents from judicial and expert hindsight? [read post]