Search for: "Weiss v. Weiss"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2017, 5:59 am
Recently in van der Fluit v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 6:13 am
In Delaware County Employees Retirement Fund, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2016, 7:16 am
In SEC v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:13 am
On January 13, 2017, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Kokesh v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:38 am
The Court’s unanimous opinion in Kokesh v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 3:44 am
In Holmes v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:30 am
GigAcquisitions3, LLC and Laidlaw v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:30 am
GigAcquisitions3, LLC and Laidlaw v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:06 am
In a recent decision in Sciabacucchi v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 6:13 am
This post is based on a Paul, Weiss publication by Mr. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 7:39 pm
"A denial of a special use permit must be supported by evidence in the record and may not be based solely upon community objection (see Matter of Green 2009, Inc. v Weiss, 114 AD3d 788; Matter of White Castle Sys., Inc. v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 93 AD3d 731). [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:55 pm
The legal complaint (pdf) in the case, Weiss v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 am
Weiss v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:53 am
Weiss v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
Coverage comes from Debra Cassens Weiss at the ABA Journal and The Associated Press. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:30 am
In Franklin v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:21 am
In Boyle v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 8:54 am
In Weiss v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:23 am
” “The statute of limitations for a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice is three years (see CPLR 214[6]; Tulino v Hiller, P.C., 202 AD3d at 1135), which accrues at the time the malpractice is committed, not when the client discovers it (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166; Goodman v Weiss, Zarett, Brofman, Sonneklar & Levy, P.C., 199 AD3d 659, 661; Sclafani v Kahn, 169 AD3d 846, 848). [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 7:26 am
Circuit Court of Appeals made that decision in Carolyn Schubert v. [read post]