Search for: "Williams v. Force Protection" Results 261 - 280 of 1,694
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Clearly, Meredith took the opposite view of the workers in this matter, surmising that it would be disadvantageous to force workers to litigate for compensation before a judge. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
The Canadian journalism industry has asked parliamentarians to pass an Australian-style law forcing Google and Meta to pay for news by the end of June, the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:32 am by Samarth Desai
And as Justice William Brennan wrote in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 1:23 pm by David Kopel
Georgetown Law's Dean, William Treanor, issued a statement denouncing Shapiro. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
It can also be understood as shared perceptions of the meaning of reality backed by massive background consensus (Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms (William Rehg (trans) MIT Press, 1996); pp. 22, 322); or as biopolitics (the narratives through which social and political power may be normalized over the control and management of the bodies of the living and their relationship to physical and abstract objects and the technologies of control) (Michel Foucault, The Birth of… [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Even in states where COVID-19 protections do remain in place, the issue has exposed a sharp partisan divide and provoked unrest among lawmakers. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
” Judge Patrick Bumatay, in dissent, argued that district courts properly have jurisdiction over certain due process and equal protection challenges Axon asserted, as well as over its constitutional challenges to the tenure protections afforded to FTC ALJs. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
Nonetheless, it concluded that Eckhardt's speech was constitutionally protected: [We] apply the two-step analysis espoused in Scott v. [read post]