Search for: "Williams v. Prospect, Inc." Results 261 - 280 of 290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 am by Broc Romanek
- Regarding the new disclosures on director qualifications, diversity policies, and board leadership and oversight of risk management, what are RMG's views and the prospects for related voting recommendations? [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
The party change much improved the prospects for gun control bills getting a committee hearing and a floor vote. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm by admin
In baseline questionnaires, participants in this large, racially and ethnically diverse prospective cohort self-reported their use of hair products in the prior 12 months, including hair dyes; straighteners, relaxers, or pressing products; and permanents or body waves. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
 The leading case appears to be the Fourth Circuit's 1999 ruling in Food Lion Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
As we've pointed out, repeatedly, here, here, here, and here, most recent precedent has either rejected altogether the idea that uninjured people can recover prospective medical expenses, or else has limited such recoveries to environmental torts. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and  the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:20 am by Kevin Goldberg
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has vacated an intern-friendly decision in Glatt v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 William Buckley, FarePlay, Inc.: Heart of the problem is the law is clearly broken; designed to make a simplified process for websites who made an error in posting © material; could remove it w/o need for lawsuit. [read post]