Search for: "Williamson v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 416
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2012, 5:11 am by Administrator
Kneedler argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance in favor of the participants and beneficiaries, with Solicitor General Days, Richard P. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 10:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  Terri Moore came up with the idea of the Conviction Integrity Unit (CIU). [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm by Steven Schwinn
United States, doesn’t touch the constitutional issues brewing in the lower courts. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 9:54 am by Michael Lowe
  One of Grits‘ good points — if a Texas judge and a Texas prosecutor can be having an affair during a murder trial and not get disciplined in any way for it, even the United States Supreme Court did nothing, then who’s taking bets on this case? [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Copyright protection in the United States was first championed by a group of authors, including Noah Webster and Joel Barlow.10 In response, a committee in the Continental Congress — consisting of James Madison, Hugh Williamson, and Ralph Izard — drafted a resolution that recommended the states pass their own copyright laws.11 Twelve of the thirteen states had passed such legislation by 1786. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:13 am by WSLL
A trial court’s duty to insure that a defendant understands the consequences of a guilty plea before he enters one extends only to direct consequences of such a plea.In addition, the United States Supreme Court, in Iowa v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am by Kiera Flynn
_________________________________________________  United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:13 am by Steve Hall
The landmark 1963 United States Supreme Court decision Brady v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am by Christa Culver
California Coastal Commission, which by definition implicate no compensation issues, fall outside the purview of the state-procedures rule outlined in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:28 am
  The Appellate Division, after noting that it is “well-settled law that an arbitration award will be vacated only where ‘it is violative of a strong public policy, or is totally irrational, or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on [the arbitrator's] power,’ citing Matter of Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v Chesley, 7 AD3d 368, decided that in this instance the Department’s arguments met this test. [read post]