Search for: "A P.2."
Results 2781 - 2800
of 27,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2022, 6:31 am
Dowell, 176 P.3d 835, 844 (Col. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 5:04 pm
The latest issue of Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Institutions (Vol. 28, no. 2, April-June 2022) is out. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:30 am
Blog posts & press:"How LGBTQI+ to LGBTQI+ support is helping Ukrainian refugees find safety in the EU," The New Humanitarian, 8 June 2022 [text]This Pride Month, We Must Pay Attention to Displaced Trans Women (RI Blog, June 2022) [text]"The Refugee Convention Nexus of Membership of a Particular Social Group with a particular focus on LGBTI+ claims," IARMJ Report, vol. 2, no. 2 (June 2022) [text]- Scroll to p. 21. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
I’m not entirely persuaded by the applications (especially regarding same-sex marriage)[1]but I’m almost entirely persuaded by Vermuele’s method of constitutional interpretation for an American context.[2] But I want to comment on something different: the possibility of extending “common good constitutionalism” to the Chinese context. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
This week the randomly selected blogs are 1.Robichaud’s Criminal Law Blog 2. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
IPSO 01429-22 Hopkins v cornwalllive.com, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 00640-22 Longstaff v The Northern Echo, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 10762-21 Peer v thesundaytimes.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 11818-21 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, 9 Reporting of crime (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 11928-21 Tierney v Wisbech Standard, 1 Accuracy (2021) No… [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:46 pm
Substantial Similarity of Protected Expression In opposing Cattelan’s motion to dismiss, Morford asserted that “[p]eople are free to duct-tape all the bananas they want to a wall; they are just not allowed to infringe my expression—claiming it as their own original artwork. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Can., 2015-05-01), 2015 CSC 24, SOQUIJ AZ-51171756, 2015EXP-1352, J.E. 2015-743, [2015] 2 R.C.S. 214. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 12:47 am
: on the recent decisions in Onuoha v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust and Kovalkovs v 2 Sisters Food Group Limited. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm
Informing the Disinfo Debate: A Policy Guide for Protecting Human Rights This joint report by Eliška Pírková, Filip Lukáš, Eva Simon, [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 4:18 am
This week I attended the IP Case Law Conference, organized by the European Union Intellectual Property Office in what was factually accurate and often referred to during the 2-day event as “sunny Alicante”.This year’s edition also celebrated the 25 years of the EUIPO Boards of Appeal.The conference, which from now on will be a yearly event, was excellent: during the two days of proceedings, over 50 speakers covered topical issues and recent case law spanning all… [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 6:29 am
Comment Period Reopens on Proposed Compensation Clawback Rules Posted by Sonia Gupta Barros, John P. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 6:29 am
Comment Period Reopens on Proposed Compensation Clawback Rules Posted by Sonia Gupta Barros, John P. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 2:00 am
If you picked scenario 1 as equality and scenario 2 as equity, you were right. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 2:00 am
If you picked scenario 1 as equality and scenario 2 as equity, you were right. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
There being two legitimate aims, the next question was whether the restriction was proportionate to them; the means chosen to achieve those aim must (a) be rationally connected to the objective and not be arbitrary, unfair or based on irrational considerations, (b) impair the right as little as possible, and (c) be such that their effects on rights are proportional to the objective … (Murphy v IRTC [46] (Barrington J), following Heaney v Ireland [1994] 3 IR 593, 607, [1994]… [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:41 am
C-124/21 P, International Skating Union v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:32 am
[P]roving the Defendant was the one downloading and distributing Strike 3's copyrighted content would likely be a key issue were the case litigated on the merits…. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:12 am
Lucas & Sons Ltd v Dorking and Horley Rural District Council (1966) 17 P & CR 111 did not apply. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 10:39 pm
An Administrative Law Judge--ALJ David P. [read post]
