Search for: "CUSTODY OF S C" Results 2781 - 2800 of 4,785
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2012, 6:21 pm
Dunham, 2012 BCSC 748, arose out a custody case in which one of the parties applied to be relieved from the obligation to pay the hearing fees (which were charged at a different rates at the time of the custody case). [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 12:25 pm by admin
(a-1) Notwithstanding Subsection (a)(2)(C), a person’s conviction of a felony in the five years preceding the date of the arrest does not affect the person’s entitlement to expunction for purposes of an ex parte petition filed on behalf of the person by the director of the Department of Public Safety under Section 2(e), Article 55.02. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:34 pm
The offense is classified as a class C felony, carrying up to seven years in prison. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (2)(a), (2)(b), or (2)(c) 4., commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084 [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:31 am
The Supreme Court overturned S.B. 1070 section 5(c) stating that section 5(c) directly conflicts with the enforcement of federal law. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:09 am by Susan Brenner
 The lawyer offered to bring the prosecution one of the hard drives for inspection, noting that he was sending the other hard drive to Staton’s expert so he could  Counsel noted that he was forwarding the other hard drive to Defendant's expert so he could “have access and physical custody over it. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:52 am by Steve
Aug. 16, 2005) (affirming denial of husband’s supersedeas bond motion). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:26 am by Kyle Hulten
 The platforms are prohibited from transaction-based compensation and custody. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 6:14 pm by John Jascob
In NASAA’s view, “verify" implies more than simply accepting an investor’s unsubstantiated representations. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
He was seized for Fourth Amendment purposes and in custody for Miranda purposes. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:28 am
This case has been discussed both by Family Law Week (see above) and by suesspiciousminds (see below).Re C [2012] EWHC 907 (Fam) (22 March 2012)Application by father to enforce Belgian order granting him custody of the child and requiring her return to Belgium. [read post]