Search for: "Crawford " Results 2781 - 2800 of 6,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2012, 11:22 am by Jon Sands
  The petitioner's appeal was after Crawford, but before Melendiaz-Diaz and Bullcoming. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:38 pm by Phil Cave
When I refer to the speaker as a witness and say that she is testifying, I am drawing on one of the essential points of Crawford: Simply because a person (such as Sylvia Crawford) speaks out of court does not mean that she is not testifying, and indeed the central focus of the Confrontation Clause is to require that testimony be given in court, under prescribed procedures[.] [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 2:38 pm
But obviously whatever case law the Supremes make will supplant (possibly while ratifying) Harcrow's Crawford analysis.Here's a link to the Melendez-Diaz cert petition, courtesy of SCOTUSblog. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:17 pm
Meanwhile, we missed a wicked-cool story from late Friday by ABC News Supreme Court reporter Jan Crawford Greenburg. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 11:45 am by John Jascob
“The bill's current language offers an unworkable regulatory review process, which, contrary to those who have mischaracterized our position on Reg D Rule 506 offerings, has not been called for by NASAA," Crawford said. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 2:06 pm by Collins & Collins
The defendant argued that the practice was a violation of the 6th Amendment confrontation clause as set forth in the 2004 Supreme Court case Crawford v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 9:46 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Stubbs, 408 U.S. 204 -- yes, all pre-Crawford cases, but no reason to believe that Crawford overruled any of them on this point:(1) If a court has not determined on the basis of other conduct that the first counsel was inadequate, the court will not ermine that the accused had an inadequate opportunity to cross on the basis that counsel did a poor job in cross.(2) If there is an independently-based determination that counsel was inadequate, (a) that does not automatically mean… [read post]
” In the wake of Crawford, the Kansas Legislature refined its election security laws in several ways bypassing the Kansas Secure and Fair Elections (SAFE) Act. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:21 am
If Crawford accepts the request, one things’ for sure: controversy will follow. [read post]
25 Jun 2006, 6:42 pm
Given that SCOTUS has taken a Crawford retroactivity case, that seemed a risky strategy.It will be interesting to see if the Colorado Supreme Court waits until after Burton to decide Johnson. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 9:27 am by Peter Tillers
Supreme Court slap down the Mississippi Supreme Court or will it say that its holding in Owens was a mistake -- or will it say, unconvincingly, that Crawford v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm by Brian Shiffrin
So one can expect further testing of the contours and limits of Crawford v Washington (541 U.S. 36 [2004]), particularity by prosecutors who can be expected to use Justice Sotomayor's opinion as a road map as to how to win her vote, and thus, a majority.It is not coincidental that this difficult 5-4 win was achieved by Jeffrey Fisher, who was the successful advocate in Crawford, and seven other criminal cases at the Supreme Court prior to winning Bullcoming. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:01 pm by Jon Sands
This was characterized as like the "emergency exception" to Crawford carved out in Michigan v. [read post]