Search for: "Ex Parte State"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 11,146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2015, 10:00 pm
In its petition the Employer did not argue that it was entitled to an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Ex parte Publix Supermarkets, Inc, 963 So. 2d 654 (Ala. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:19 am
California ex rel. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 5:59 am
What part of the US constitution and Maine's own constitution, do you not understand? [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:38 am
Issue: Did the trial court err when it denied the 50B ex parte DVPO and DVPO? [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:52 am
James Joyner of the Atlantic Council was wondering the other day, if the United States are now Losing New Europe, Too? [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:31 am
" Ex parte Jackson, 96 U.S. 727, 733, 24 L. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:24 am
So Ex parte Jackson doesn't apply; as I noted earlier, the laptop is luggage and the border search exception applies to it. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 7:12 am
(Ex parte Muthu-Manivannan, Appeal 2014-006595, PTAB June 13, 2016.)Details:Ex parte Muthu-ManivannanAppeal 2014-006595; Application 12/031,990; Technology Center 2400Decided: June 13, 2016In a recent decision in which the Applicant appealed an examiner's rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103, the Board entered a new ground of rejection under 35 U.S.C. 101 for method claims that were directed to "prioritizing events on an electrical power… [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 12:48 pm
The case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 10:00 pm
See Ex Parte Salsbury, 38 U.S.P.Q. 149, 1938 WL 28182, at *2 (Com'r Pat. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:43 am
The decision from the USPTO Appeals Review Panel (ARP) in Ex parte Chamberlain, Appeal No. 2022-001944 reaches a remarkable conclusion on written description for a broad functional antibody claim. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:42 pm
§ 3729(a)(1)(G), of the False Claims Act: US ex rel. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:42 pm
§ 3729(a)(1)(G), of the False Claims Act: US ex rel. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 8:46 am
May 21, 2018); Ex Parte Erhart, APPEAL 2019-004505, 2021 WL 195811 (Patent Tr. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:53 pm
A number of states besides Indiana have blacklisting laws. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:32 am
And I don't see why any communication necessarily has to be ex parte. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 3:42 am
No plaintiff’s lawyer in his right mind would represent your soon-to-be-ex employee? [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:48 am
The trucking industry is a VERY BIG business in the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am
More to the point, Section Three is a part of constitutional amendment, not a federal law. [read post]
