Search for: "French v. French"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 4,623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2019, 5:31 am
Papers may be submitted in English or French, and all entries should be submitted to admin@atrip.org, no later than 17 February 2020.The author of the paper should also be no older than 35 years of age as of December 31, 2020. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:19 am
However, a registration is required if filing a copyright infringement suit, and the Supreme Court recently held in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:22 am
In case you missed the news, the controversial Magmatic v PMS International litigation over the scope of protection enjoyed by the designers of Trunki children's luggage is heading for the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:35 am
In addition Birss J followed Arnold J’s approach in EMI v BSkyB when considering what elements should be taken into account to determine whether a certain website is targeted at a specific public, including the number of visitors. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 1:35 pm
For a complete overview (in French), see the Blog du Droit Européen des Brevets, which provides an overview of the main amendments and the related case law.The well-known company Philips was the protagonist of a patent infringement suit in the Netherlands, which was recently dealt with by the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:10 am
I suspect that most Kat readers will not recognize the name of the man whom the legendary French new wave director, Jean-Luc Goddard, called “the best American camera man. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:17 pm
Related Issues: Free SpeechAnonymityInternationalSurveillance and Human RightsPrivacySecurityState-Sponsored MalwareRelated Cases: Kidane v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
The day before, the same blog featured a note by French IP expert and Katfriend Richard Milchior on proof of the existence and ownership of copyright in a shoe design. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 8:19 am
In Milo Thompson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
Over on the 1709 Blog, Iona Harding tackles SAS v WPL and the continuing question of whether copyright can vest in a computer language, while Simon Fogarty guests some hot and revealing news concerning New Zealand's three sheep strikes and you're out file-sharing ruling. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 12:00 am
Recent cases (Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook) have demonstrated the perils of worldwide content takedown orders. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:04 am
And the Supremes agreed.Yesterday, they issued their opinion in State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:35 am
Dorris v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:21 pm
* 5 seconds of contact time is sufficient, says Arnold JDavid reports on Compactgtl Ltd v Velocys Plc & Others [2014] EWHC 2951 (Pat), an Arnoldian decision of the Patents Court, England and Wales. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:54 am
There have been instances when highly creative unconventional works, such as the assembly of a scene or a Stormtrooper helmet, were not found eligible for copyright protection because they could not be pigeon-holed within any of the eight categories of works that UK law protects.Having said this, it would now seem that compliance with EU law requires adoption of open-ended subject-matter categorisations, as is already the case under, say, French, German and Italian laws. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
The company was successful in both judgments on the basis of Article 8(5) EUTMR.BackgroundIn 2018, a French individual filed two applications with the EUIPO to register the word sign "GOOGLE CAR" and the above figurative sign "GC GOOGLE CAR". [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
For more on this case: https://www.eff.org/cases/lawrence-lessig-v-liberation-music About Prof. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 10:15 am
Chillin' Competition has offered a rather more competition-flavoured account of the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling yesterday in Case C-170/13 Huawei v ZTE, a ruling which to this Kat gave a somewhat shortish shrift yesterday. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 10:50 am
In Freshwater v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 8:40 am
The Canadian Supreme Court decision in Equustek and the French Conseil d'Etat decision to make a CJEU reference in Google v CNIL have once again focused attention on the intractable issues around cross-border liability for publication on the internet. [read post]
