Search for: "Grant v. United States"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 25,668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm
The Court of Appeals goes on to explain that on June 20, 2014, the Superior Court granted the motion. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:42 am
In addition, several amicus briefs in support of granting certiorari have been filed in Spokeo, which can be found here (by Pacific Legal Foundation), here (by ACA International), here (by Trans Union LLC), here (by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America), here (by eBay Inc., Facebook, Inc., Google, Inc. and Yahoo! [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm
First up is United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 3:05 pm
The first, which seems like a likely grant, is United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
But the cases it cites—like Jones v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:22 pm
United States (Jurisdiction; Grant in Aid Funds) on 4/5/18. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:25 am
The High Court has granted declarations to FKB and SB to the effect that their products lacked novelty or an inventive step at a particular date - Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Company Limited and Samsung Bioepsis UK Limited v AbbVie Biotechnology Limited [2017] EWHC 395 (Pat). [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
"] On Friday, January 5, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Trump v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 9:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:45 am
AMP v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm
United States, 10-8659, and Vargas-Solis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
United States, 10-7515, for United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:43 am
The district court observed that the United States Supreme Court has established that "[b]efore a federal court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the procedural requirement of service of summons must be satisfied. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:53 am
Three new petitions granted Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 7:21 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988), because a False Marking qui tam relator is not an inferior officer of the government, but rather, is an assignee of a revocable interest of the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:49 am
In a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the district court granted defendant's motion in limine to exclude plaintiff's damage expert's testimony based on the entire market value rule. [read post]
