Search for: "High v State" Results 2781 - 2800 of 35,513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2014, 6:22 pm
Challinor, The Decision of the English High Court in Rogers & Anor v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 7:05 pm by Edward Foley
Given the recent news from Washington State, and the previous news from Georgia, and the historically high unpopularity of both presidential candidates, it seems as if this really could be the year of the faithless elector--at least at levels we haven't seen before, and potentially litigation over the issue that pushes the legal and constitutional issues beyond Ray v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
In another demonstration of the high cost to governmental entities of litigating First Amendment claims, a Texas federal magistrate judge in Freedom from Religion Foundation v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 5:41 am
The awards can be lower than what a typical jury would give, but I hear attorneys on the other side lament often that the awards can also be high. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:43 am by DONALD SCARINCI
However, a subsequent joint rule limited the section’s geographic scope to the United States and the high seas. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The long running and high profile “blogger defamation” case of Baglow v Smith has been determined in the defendant’s favour. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 8:22 pm by Florian Mueller
Gilstrap--whose more formal title is Chief United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas--handed down a scheduling order in the Ericsson v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 11:32 pm by Jeremy
Rather, it challenged the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court to entertain Microsoft’s claims on the ground that Microsoft has not provided proof of reciprocal protection of copyright laws between Nigeria and United States of America. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 10:23 am by Jack Goldsmith
Second, if NATO invokes Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty, it would trigger an international law obligation on the United States to “assist” France by taking “such action as [the United States] deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. [read post]