Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 4,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
OEIGWG CHAIRMANSHIP SECOND REVISED DRAFT 06.08.2020 LEGALLY BINDING INSTRUMENT TO REGULATE, IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, THE ACTIVITIES OF TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND OTHER BUSINESS ENTERPRISES Preamble The State Parties to this (Legally Binding Instrument),Reaffirming the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations; Recalling the nine core International Human Rights Instruments adopted by the United Nations, and the eight… [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:55 am
The Supreme Court is currently considering the meaning of “accrues” in the context of suing the United States government in Corner Post, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:17 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 am
In Knox Couty v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 8:11 pm
Samsung, Microsoft v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
See, Spertell v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
Just 5 years ago, the United States Supreme Court upheld a taking of property for purely economic reasons. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
Issue: Whether a trustee has standing to assert claims "on behalf of debenture holders" under Caplin v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:51 pm
See Anunciato et al. v Biden et al. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:51 am
Holder Issue: Whether the five-year limitations period of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
The judges observed that the Hatch-Waxman Act appears to be very sensitive to antitrust concerns, and cited several cases (inter alia, United States v Singer Mfg. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 3:41 pm
Last week, EFF, ACLU, and ACLU of Minnesota filed an amicus brief in State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
From Renna v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:05 am
Alavi seemed to have a pretty good argument under Dowling, but the prosecution fought back by citing the issue the Dowling Court didn’t address: The United States does not allege that the software Alavi allegedly exported was stolen merely because [he] infringed an exclusive right of the copyright holder. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 3:52 pm
The court held that the conviction was consistent with the First Amendment, as applied in Holder v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am
” However, entry to the United States under that statute is limited to two years. [read post]
