Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 8,735
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
.: Right to ‘inspect’ CBAs negotiated by union didn’t include right to take notes A union member’s statutory right to “inspect” collective bargaining agreements negotiated by her union with employers other than her own did not encompass a right to take notes while doing so, ruled the First Circuit. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 12:36 pm
[But why does that mean it should matter to the fair use analysis?] [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 10:24 am
As usual, I have to skip a lot of interesting presentations and I try to attend things I haven’t seen, no matter how good the ones I have already seen/read drafts of are.Session 1: Trademarks Jason George (and Lisa Larrimore Ouellette), Trademarks as Innovation IncentivesNot saying that the goal is/should be innovation. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Patrick listened to his son’s anguish in dealing with this matter and calmly replied, “I did not hang them, George; the law did. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:31 am
[W]e must consider ... not whether sexual conduct was the dominant theme of the movie but, rather, whether, taken as a whole, the movie appeals to the prurient interest. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:03 am
Netflix doesn't know merely what we're watching, but when, where and with what kind of device we're watching. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
Why did it take IRS so long to contact me about this matter? [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
The closest either majority came was the admonition in Janus to the effect that “[w]e will not overturn a past decision unless there are strong grounds for doing so. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 2:05 pm
Innovation isn’t just about increasing efficiency or creating a solution to a problem. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:25 am
Nevertheless, after the reports of the 1858 gold discovery, Kansas Governor James W. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:31 pm
The July 30, 2018 Order In a July 30, 2018 order written by Justice James T. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:17 am
” At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Randy Barnett adds that “[w]hat will matter a great deal to me is that he affirms at his hearings–readily and without apology–that he is a public meaning originalist. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:32 pm
Holden, No. 16-30186 (7-26-18)(Graber w/M. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:09 am
Police generally need to investigate matters further, to see if the post was really a threat or sarcasm -- and if they don't investigate further, and don't have a good reason for the immediate arrest, they can be sued for a Fourth Amendment violation, and be denied qualified immunity.From Ross v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:59 am
As always, I’d be interested in others’ thoughts about this matter. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Dooneen Ltd (t/a McGuines Associates) & Anor v Mond (Scotland), heard 3 Jul 2018. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 10:36 am
Brito v. 4018 W. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Thirteen years ago, after George W. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
This form is paper only, which means that you can’t file it electronically, no matter how awesome your internet connectivity may be. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:51 am
Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., warns that “[t]he methodical review of a federal court nominee’s record is not optional,” and that “[w]earing blinders when considering a former administration official for a lifetime judgeship presents grave risks. [read post]
