Search for: "In Re Doe I" Results 2781 - 2800 of 70,548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2009, 8:38 am
  It often has news that does not make it to the mainstream media. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:58 am
The columnist simply takes the position that the man — who, we're told, "does whatever he wants, my needs be damned" — is just a fake and not a feminist at all. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 4:55 am by Doug Cornelius
I’m going to re-think how I design my certification. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 11:07 am
I hypothesize that the newspapers are looking to the past for a new infusion of colorful villains to excite readers.We're so childishly into villains these days, and political partisans must worry that that we will satisfy our appetite by regarding anyone who makes it into the limelight as a villain. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:37 am by Ashwin Sharma
The top of the new Form I-797C will clearly display: “THIS NOTICE DOES NOT GRANT ANY IMMIGRATION STATUS OR BENEFIT. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 8:20 pm
Update: I should have read more carefully: Time Warner and Verizon confirmed they’re not going to block any Web sites. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
In the non precedential decision In re Grace Estrellado, the Board of Immigration Appeals states that alien may not utilize the priority date form her original I-140 petition because it was withdrawn by her prior employer and the USCIS revoked it. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by James Côté
Given the lectures were all recordings, I could even re-watch sections to ensure I understood everything. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:29 pm by Atty. Gregory A. Holbus
However, because of the very issue you're facing, I've made a point of informing my clients about reaffirmation agreements, their consequences (both in signing and not signing one) and what they need to do if the lender does not initiate a reaffirmation agreement. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 10:31 pm by Jeff Gamso
As one Texas judge put it in the face of such allegations: “The Constitution does not require perfection in trial representation. [read post]