Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 12,646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2009, 4:05 pm
Busch, 112 So. 274 (Fla. 1927) provided the greatest support for the State's position, then why didn't the Florida Supreme Court mention the case in its opinion: JUSTICE ALITO: Can I -- Mr. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 5:24 pm
The result would be two Supreme Court opinions holding that the Second Amendment is not incorporated despite five Justices favoring incorporation. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
Opinion below (D.C. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:59 am
" (If you're wondering, we're almost but not quite there yet.) [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 6:16 am
Instead, I get to offer a link to this week’s “We’re taking it all the way to the Supreme Court” case. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
Look here for a discussion of the brief of the 24 law professors and the In re Lee case. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:17 am
When they put on the robe, they're interchangeable. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 6:05 pm
However, the Court argued that where this "re-ordering" does occur in statute it is unambiguously clear that it does. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
Opinion below (10th Circuit, rehearing denied) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply The Court has re-listed the following cases from previous editions of Petitions to Watch for the conference of June 3, 2010. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 7:43 am
From Justice Robyn Brody's majority opinion yesterday in Planned Parenthood Great Northwest v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 7:15 pm
One example would be the recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice bankruptcy decision in McGoey (Re), where the court reviewed a motion by the trustee seeking a declaration on two properties held in joint tenancy by a couple are assets of the estate. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:30 am
Opinion should be available soon on the Eleventh Circuit’s website.UPDATE: The very lengthy opinion is here. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 12:35 pm
“They’re sitting in Denver. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:49 am
Justice Thomas suggested that Rule 137 was all over the Appellate Court’s opinion. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:05 pm
That's a pretty positive endorsement of Justice Baker. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 8:50 am
That’s not how criminal procedure works in this country, and you don’t get special criminal procedure rules just because you’re Donald Trump. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
But unlike that of the typical Supreme Court nominee, Kagan’s body of work contained no judicial opinions. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
“What you’re asking,” she objects, “is just shy of treason. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am
Judge Russell Mock of the First District Court of Appeals sat for Justice O’Neill, and joined Justice Kennedy’s opinion. [read post]
5 Nov 2022, 1:59 pm
Powell Jr. wrote the plurality opinion in 1978’s Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
