Search for: "James v. United States (two Cases)" Results 2781 - 2800 of 2,865
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm
Circuit (Detroit Newspaper Agency v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
For the reasons stated below, we REVERSE the district court's denial of the State's motion for clarification and REMAND with instructions that the district court grant the State's motion for clarification consistent with this opinion. 07a0294p.06 2007/08/03 Williams v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Defendant also argues that his 360-month sentence of incarceration is unreasonable in light of United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
This case involved a different set of circumstances than United States ex. rel.Fowler v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:17 am
Partner James Kelleher says the response "was in excess of what we'd set as a goal. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
The nomination was made without input from the state's two Democratic senators, Frank Lautenberg and Robert Menendez. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
It's an obligation when they take that oath to faithfully uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. . . . [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
This high-speed police pursuit case deals with the shocks the conscience standard set forth in County of Sacramento v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
Madison One of the great ironies of the seminal case Marbury v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:51 am
In a response sent to the state, Orrick partner James Houpt called contracts between the firm and the state "indisputably ambiguous. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:24 am
Justice Alito writes for the majority plurality in Hein v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
State of Indiana , a 14-page opinion, Chief Judge Baker writes:Appellant-defendant James E. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
Albalah, UNITED STATES: EXTRA CREDIT: PROSPECTIVE CREDITORS' COMMITTEE MEMBERS SHOULD CAREFULLY ASSESS THE PROS AND CONS OF SERVING, Mondaq Article ID: 48648***Keith Aurzada, UNITED STATES: SINGLE ASSET REAL ESTATE CASES--ENFORCING THE STAY MAY BE DIFFICULT UNDER THE NEW BANKRUPTCY CODE, Mondaq Article ID: 48476***Renee Bacon, A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR ADVISING A FRANCHISEE WHOSE FRANCHISOR FILES CHAPTER 11, 16 J. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:55 am
Low-Profile Supreme Court Case Offers Glimpse of Sharp Divide Legal Times The case of Bowles v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 3:17 pm
Hamdan may seek further review in the Supreme Court of the United States at the earliest available opportunity. [read post]