Search for: "Land v. State" Results 2781 - 2800 of 13,218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2017, 3:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On July 7, 2017, the California Supreme Court filed its 69-page opinion, written by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and joined by five other justices, in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On July 7, 2017, the California Supreme Court filed its 69-page opinion, written by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and joined by five other justices, in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:43 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
We answer this question in the affirmative and conclude, pursuant to our recent holding in Matter of Goldstein v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 11:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Environmental Law – Response and Cleanup; Liability) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlIn re Doe (Indian Child Welfare Act – Application of)In re England, Minor (Indian Child Welfare Act – Best Interest of the Child)Town of Verona v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 6:00 pm
The FAA, as federal legislation, is the "supreme law of the land. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 That said, the AG really lands some compelling points in Michigan's brief.The issue, as framed by the SCOTUS and now amplified by the Michigan Attorney General, is whether states are required to license same-sex marriages; and whether states must recognize same-sex nuptials performed in another state.The Michigan AG asserts that in a democratic society, it is offensive to have un-elected federal jurists deciding such important intimate issues that have been… [read post]
Roberts v Lawton dealt with historic rentcharges of the type used in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century to secure continuing payments to the original seller of freehold land after the land was sold. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 10:06 pm by Patricia Salkin
The ordinance in question was the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (“APFO”) requiring land developers to pay impact fees as a condition of obtaining necessary permits for development. [read post]