Search for: "London v. State" Results 2781 - 2800 of 4,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
United States A judge has ruled that Rep. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
If parties are no longer free to do so under English law, then as Laurence Rabinowitz QC (for the London Court of International Arbitration, intervening) put it, the risk of a “chilling effect” on arbitration in London would be substantial. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Room A130, College Building, City University London [please note room change]. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
In Williamson v The Bishop of London & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 379, the primary question at issue was the meaning and effect of s.42, and in particular whether, where proceedings were brought without leave, it operated as a jurisdictional bar or merely as a procedural one. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm
"Member States Discuss Key Copyright Issues" is the title of a recent media release from the World Intellectual Property Organization. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:00 am
Austin v- Metropolitan Police Commissioner was brought by a demonstrator who attended anti-capitalist protests in London in 2001. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:38 am
 C-281/10 P PepsiCo v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic (click here for details of the General Court's decision and here for the grounds of appeal). [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 7:24 am by Sally-Ann Underhill and Thinn Nyunt
The reasoning in the decisions on the “expected ready” provision suggests that such an obligation probably does arise, and this view has been adopted by London arbitrators. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:53 am
 It's Case C-657/11 Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology (BEST) v Bert Peelaers and Visys NV. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:13 am by Adam Wagner
Her case against Ofsted, the Secretary of State for Children and Families and the London Borough of Haringey, which will now go to the Court of Appeal, is one of the many ripple effects of the scandal, alongside the government’s recent announcement that it would review the child protection system. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 3:53 am by Paul Cartwright
A joint minute by the experts stated that the ordering of blood for the transfusion was unduly delayed. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Economou v De Freitas, heard 13-17, 20, 22 June 2016 (Warby J). [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
United States Last week, President Biden established the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which appears will be focusing particularly on online harms which “disproportionately affect women, girls, people of colour and LGBTQI+ individuals” with “technology-facilitated gender-based violence” its top priority. [read post]