Search for: "M. M."
Results 2781 - 2800
of 311,415
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2024, 9:02 am
Beginning thirty days after publication in the Federal Register, the Radio Duplication Rule will once more prohibit commercial FM stations from devoting more than 25 percent of the total hours in their average broadcast week to programs that duplicate those of any other commonly-owned FM station; or with which it has a time brokerage agreement if the principal community contours (defined as predicted 3.16 mV/m) of the stations overlap and the overlap constitutes more than 50 percent… [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 9:01 am
Unfortunately, I’m not sure that’s the situation here. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:58 am
There were lots of different information streams feeding together, and I think that was a fairly minor one so far, but I’m glad we did it. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
Scherer and Erik Hager of Conrad & Scherer LLP, Agnieszka Fryszman and Leslie M. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
Scherer and Erik Hager of Conrad & Scherer LLP, Agnieszka Fryszman and Leslie M. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
Scherer and Erik Hager of Conrad & Scherer LLP, Agnieszka Fryszman and Leslie M. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:17 am
Class action independent contractor misclassification cases continue to be filed and most seem to settle, often for large sums, as we have reported in our blog posts on legal developments each month. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:03 am
Case date: 08 February 2024 Case number: No. 22-5843 Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design Law by… [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:24 am
I’m really looking forward to digging in. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:14 am
The Court held that the judge had still arrived at the correct approach based on previous case law and the facts of the case More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design Law by Verena von Bomhard and Alexander von… [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:53 am
In Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, ASBCA No. 62209 (a C&M case), the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Board) awarded $131,888,860 in damages plus applicable interest in connection with Lockheed Martin’s claim for the cumulative disruptive impacts it experienced in performing over and above work on the C-5 Reliability Enhancement and Re-Engining Program. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:53 am
I’m a lawyer by profession, but have taken a somewhat unconventional career path—I started as a litigator in a small general practice in my hometown outside Toronto, moved on to corporate law with one the world’s biggest law firms in London, Hong Kong, and Abu Dhabi, and then came back to Canada, where I moved through roles in polling and market research, lobbying, and tax advocacy. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:39 am
What did defendant say: the Government claims he said, "If I go back to the post office, I'm gonna shoot somebody," and other similar comments. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:39 am
We explore how these trends influence the M&A landscape and the implications for eDiscovery professionals. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:10 am
AND DEIRDRE FITZPATRICK AND I’M TEO TORRES. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:08 am
Last week, the Columbia Law Review’s board of directors shut down its website briefly because of concerns about the process by which the review published an article critical of Israel. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
M-2024-01240 — Matter of Joseph v Sewell, et al. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
M-2024-01240 — Matter of Joseph v Sewell, et al. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 5:39 am
“I’m hoping that the person or persons who perpetrated this crime sees this and knows that we as a community are standing together for our young people,” Lacy said. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
[The court concludes the pastor's posts were about the activists' organization (Oklahomans for Equality) and not about them personally; it thus avoided having to decide whether the First Amendment would have protected the speech if it was indeed about the activists personally.] [read post]
