Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 2781 - 2800 of 5,344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
., 973 P.2d 527, 542 (Cal. 1999)), which don’t follow anybody else’s pattern. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Then there’s the trader who uses the mark in Country B—potential consumer deception. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:16 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE WORKER’S COMPENSATION CLAIM OF: DON BIRCH v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:21 am
(MTC), likewise calls for holding prisons accountable for “outcomes”; but these “outcomes” include not only assaults, escapes, recidivism, overcrowding, and the like, but also outputs like “[s]ubstance abuse education/treatment completions” and “[p]roportion of inmates participating in spiritual development program(s). [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
This is the third post in a series about my new article, Prison Accountability and Performance Measures, which is in the current issue of the Emory Law Journal. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:22 am by WSLL
Reversed and Remanded.Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE WRONGFUL DEATH OF DANIEL P. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
 (b) The purpose of patient labeling for human prescription drug products required under this part is to provide information when the FDA determines in writing that it is necessary to patients’ safe and effective use of drug products. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:26 am by Marty Lederman
  Hobby Lobby asserts in its brief (p.11) that dropping its health care plan would result in "crippling consequences." [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
(para 45) Turning to the matter in hand, Laws LJ observed that this privileging of political speech over other forms of expression has a distorting effect on the proportionality debate. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am by Marty Lederman
  (The brief at several places asserts that federal law requires the Greens or the employers "to provide specific contraceptives" to employees (p. 15; see also pp. 34, 41). [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
These all went to matters outside the pleadings.Gilles satisfied Rule 9(b) by pointing to specific statements that Ford made that he relied upon. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 6:02 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The threshold for issuing a form W-2 is based on dollars – nothing else matters. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
But this statement refers to content-neutral restrictions, which focus on matters unrelated to the communicative impact of the speech. [read post]