Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 3,062
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
., 26 Cal.4th 465, 478 (2001), when it held that negligent-entrustment-based claims against gun manufacturers were "product liability" actions subject to limits placed on such claims, no matter how the plaintiffs tried to "recast" their claim as something else.Calling an inadequate warning claim based upon product labeling a "misrepresentation," and allowing liability against the purported author of the misrepresentation even though the defendant didn't… [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:23 pm
Brown J. in the recent decision of Re Henderson, 2008 CanLII 69136 addresses the issue, and highlights the evidence required by the court when determining whether a bond is to be dispensed with. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:54 am
C. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 9:48 am
B. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
" Philip C. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 5:52 pm
"Mode C provides for a larger number of specified custodians and a wider time period than Mode B, and also provides that the parties may agree to allow documents obtained through forensic methods to be admitted. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
Dub Herring Ford Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit DAMON J. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
C. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
The court of appeals held that attorneys' fees were recoverable under the declaratory judgment act and did not address the alternative bases of recovery, TBCA art. 5.14(j) (for the derivative actions) and TBCA art. 2.44(B), (D) (for violation of inspection rights). [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
Tompkins in no way abandons and/or waives anyarguments as to the matters contained in his habeas petitionwhich are not expressly addressed in this motion.Case 8:08-cv-02212-SDM-MAP Document 12 Filed 11/19/2008 Page 2 of 17of this motion, Mr. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
Raymond C. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 11:41 pm
Mandelkar, and Ani C. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
J. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
"B. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 6:28 pm
District Judge Herman J. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 8:42 am
Applying that same standard, the Second Circuit Court in Sealed Plaintiff outlined a series of factors to be considered in conducting the balancing test, which are: (a) whether the litigation involves matters that are highly personal or sensitive, or a plaintiff that is particularly vulnerable; (b) whether there is a risk of retaliation against the party filing suit or any innocent non-parties; (c) whether the identification presents other harms and the severity of those… [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:28 pm
The government will has four possile responses: (a) an argument that the NZCA was just wrong or can be distinguished; (b) a technical argument that the NZCA decision was kinda sorta ultra vires, according to the NZSC; (c) an argument that US and UK judgments on quite different schemes, or Australian HCA dicta on Chapter 3, should be preferred to the NZCA decision; or (d) retrospectivity, schmetrospecitivity! [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 9:19 am
(E.D.PA, October 30, 2008, Shapiro, J.). [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:51 pm
” b. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 12:10 am
In Shea, Finch, J. [read post]
