Search for: "MATTER OF J M J" Results 2781 - 2800 of 5,063
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
Stated differently, the facts disclosed must not be a matter of legitimate public concern. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The commercial context also mattered: many food bars used the six elements, either individually or some in combination, which additionally undercut the strength of the trade dress and “indicate[d] that its claim is pitched at an improper level of generality. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:20 pm by azatty
Miller, Arizona Court of Appeals, Division Two; Susan M. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 2:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Article 7 encompassed both juvenile delinquency matters and persons in need of supervision as held in Matter of Robert J. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 10:23 am by Tom Goldstein
  We are subject matter experts, but we are set up as a news organization with strict editorial standards and separation from my work as a lawyer. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 3:04 pm
Once again, the denial of what has brought matters to this point is astonishing. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
However, after the decision is taken by the Cabinet and the matter is complete or over, the decision and the materials on the basis of which such decision was taken shall be made public under the Act. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:57 am by Joel R. Brandes
Pendente Lite Maintenance -  Domestic Relations Law § 236(b)(5-a) - Second Department Holds That  Formula Amount Is Intended to Cover All of a  Payee Spouse's Basic Living Expenses, Including Housing Costs, the Costs of Food and Clothing, and Other Usual Expenses. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
As my colleague Perell J. put it in High Parklane Consulting Inc. v Royal Group Technologies Ltd., [2007] OJ No 107 (SCJ), at para 36, “[i]t is trite to say that making a living is a stressful activity and that much of life can be nasty and brutish. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
(c) Increase in the Number of Recusals It has been argued that judicial fundraising has the undesired potential of contributing to an excessive number of recusals.[105] This is problematic since regular disqualifications impose a cost on both the justice system and the public.[106] This is because such involvement “Will often necessitate the disqualification of a judge in a matter they have been involved with or have familiarly with due to their extrajudicial activities”.[107]… [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
 That’s where the fun begins (and, to a large extent, ends)…I'll have you know I'm an expert...Choose your expert in haste and repent at leisureRovi’s expert was the aforementioned Mr J. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:15 pm by Christopher Bruner
Cheffins & Richard Nolan, Private Enforcement of Corporate Law: An Empirical Comparison of the UK and US, 6 J. [read post]