Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 3,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2011, 2:34 pm
The offence is defined in s. 430 (1) of the Criminal Code: 430. (1) Everyone one commits mischief who wilfully, (a) destroys or damages property; (b) renders property dangerous, useless, inoperative or ineffective; (c) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property; or (d) obstructs, interrupts or interfereres with any person in the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 2:07 pm
These requirements can be found in 21 CFR 101.93(b) through (e) and 21 CFR 101.93(a), respectively. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
See… this is an excellent example of why I’m starting to think we’ve become too civilized a society. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:34 pm
Jonathan C. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Matthew B. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 4:47 am
Required Disclosures Item 24 of Schedule 14A; Item 402(b) of Reg. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:35 pm
I’m sure they’ll be happy to help. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
The Deputy Master who initially dealt with costs agreed with Southwark, HHJ Macduff reversed this decision on appeal and so the case came before the Court of Appeal with the Law Society joining in as an intervenor on behalf of S and M (although they were doing so more on the basis of support for B & C). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
The Deputy Master who initially dealt with costs agreed with Southwark, HHJ Macduff reversed this decision on appeal and so the case came before the Court of Appeal with the Law Society joining in as an intervenor on behalf of S and M (although they were doing so more on the basis of support for B & C). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:54 am
(b) these attributes have to be consistently and accurately recorded, and the human beings who input them are neither consistent nor always accurate, and (c) even if they were, people are not perfectly rational buyers and sellers. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
The coffee purchased by her on 2/27/92 was unreasonably dangerous because it was excessively hot and Defendants are liable to her for the physical and mental harm which it caused at the time of its sale and consumption on 2/27/92.B. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:59 am
(b) The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
(2) Brochures, booklets, mailing pieces, detailing pieces, file cards, bulletins, calendars, price lists, catalogs, house organs, letters, motion picture films, film strips, lantern slides, sound recordings, exhibits, literature, and reprints and similar pieces of printed, audio, or visual matter descriptive of a drug and references published (for example, the “Physicians Desk Reference”) for use by medical practitioners, pharmacists, or nurses, containing drug information… [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:36 am
Only a certain amount of people can get A’s (5-10%), B’s (10-15%), D’s(10-15%), and F’s (5-10%), and about 50-60% get C’s. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm
Applying Davidson v Chief Constable of North Wales [1994] 2 All ER 597, the fact that the hospital trust’s actions were lawful were not curative of the underlying unlawfulness: There may be false imprisonment by A although it was B who took the person into custody and B acted lawfully, provided that A directly caused B’s act and that A’s act was done without lawful justification’ [35] A lawful act by a second act does not prevent the… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
(c).) [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:48 pm
” The Comments matter. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
It matters to me. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 6:03 pm
So I’m willing to vote “Yes” to Question D. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 8:23 am
They said 157(b)(2)(C) as written would be, yes, unconstitutional. [read post]
