Search for: "Million v State"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 24,665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2015, 4:45 am
In the recent Court of Chancery decision of De Vries v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:20 pm
And, as we stated in FCC v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:32 am
Findley v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 10:16 am
■ First up, a tale of wasteful spending courtesy of co-blogger Bob V. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 9:00 am
The jury’s verdict of $5.5 million was reduced by California state law to $3.6 million. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:20 pm
The IRW, in which both the State and the Nation claim interests, covers approximately one million acres straddling the Oklahoma-Arkansas border. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
" He gave some examples of why the cost of this litigation was so high—searching through "millions" of emails and reviewing "hundreds of thousands" of documents during discovery, over forty depositions taken, and a forty-page motion for summary judgment. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 12:38 am
United States, Nos. 07-255/6/7C (Fed. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:45 pm
Ct. 1061 (2016)Sturgeon v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am
So it was yesterday at the High Court in Washington, D.C. for argument in the case of United States v Texas, posing an important immigration policy question that tests the very limits of executive branch power.This case presented an evenly divided Court -down one justice following Justice Scalia's sudden death in February- with the task of passing muster on President Obama's innovative immigration policy; a series of recent executive directives made through the Department… [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
The United States, as incarnated in its Chief Executive and as articulated in his State of the Union, suggests this process of aging. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 12:00 am
In Moore v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
Filed: November 7, 2013 (unpublished)Opinion by: Judge Andre Davis Held: the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina was not clearly erroneous and did not abuse its discretion in ruling that (1) the parties reached a binding and enforceable oral settlement agreement; and (2) plaintiff did not proceed in bad faith, so neither a dismissal with prejudice nor an award of attorney's fees was appropriate.Facts: Plaintiff made a $12 million… [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:33 am
Supreme Court case, Perdue v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:30 pm
Plus pay the $15 million fine.And yeah, yeah, I know. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 8:23 am
Bird Yelp, Twitter and Facebook Aren’t State Actors–Quigley v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 11:19 pm
The case is Naugle v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:07 am
Patient Rights v. [read post]
