Search for: "New v. State"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 107,445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2011, 11:00 am
In the case of the United States of America v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:47 am
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Claimant appealed.The Appellate Division, citing Orser v Wholesale Fuel Distribs. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Claimant appealed.The Appellate Division, citing Orser v Wholesale Fuel Distribs. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:43 pm
The case is Bollinger Shipyards Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 11:07 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:00 pm
Facts of Shaw v Reno As a result of the 1990 census, North Carolina became entitled to a 12th seat in the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:36 am
Here: Pojoaque Opening Brief Other briefs TK. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:57 am
Federal prosecutors have filed obscenity charges against Adult DVD Empire in the Western District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:36 pm
Maxwell (1966) and Estes v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 7:28 am
In the recent Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division case of State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 11:37 am
Last week, Missouri Governor Eric Greitens announced that the state had reversed course on the policy at the heart of Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:55 pm
Dept. of Interior (disenrollment)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured:Native Village of Tununak v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:52 am
In Latif v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:36 pm
The petition seeks review of CAAF's opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 6:31 am
State’s (AG) Response to Tribe’s Pet for Rehearing Earlier briefs on the rehearing petition are here. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:23 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Wednesday unanimously reversed [opinion, PDF] a California appeals court ruling [opinion, PDF] in Williamson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:32 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Wednesday ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 in AT&T v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:21 pm
In Downing/Salt Pond Partners v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:24 am
This morning, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor, the Court held that it does violate the Ex Post Facto Clause to sentence a defendant based on guidelines that were promulgated after he committed his crimes, when the new version provides a higher sentencing range than the version in place at the time of the offense. [read post]
