Search for: "People v J." Results 2781 - 2800 of 7,244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
’” Section 9.61.260(1)(b) is unconstitutionally overbroad on its face, because it criminalizes much heated political and personal commentary of the sort that is routine when people discuss matters that outrage them. 1. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:14 am by Priscilla Smith
The government cannot penalize people for exercising their constitutional rights, and Roe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by JONATHAN GLASSON QC, MATRIX
In these cases, which certainly include D and V, a proper criminal investigation by the state is required. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 6 July 2017, Dingemans J handed down judgment in the case of Guise v Shah [2017] EWHC 1689 (QB). [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am by Randy Barnett
As I explain in my book at greater length, Chief Justice Salmon Chase dissented from the Supreme Court’s decision in Bradwell v Illinois (1873), which upheld the discrimination against women in licensing lawyers. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:48 am by SHG
Nor was Brennan, although he was both able and influential, as indeed was Stevens—until he wrote a ridiculous opinion in Clinton v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:38 pm
Data Protection Commissioner (C.J.E.U.), with introductory note by Tobias J. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In Woodward v Grice [2017] EWHC 1292 (QB) the High Court considered the appropriate level of damages to award against a fan of the club for libellous statements made on an online forum. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Brighton’s Argus newspaper breached the Editors’ Code with a story which claimed the local council evicted homeless people from tents on New Year’s Day. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
On 21 June 2017 Warby J heard an application in the case of RJH v News Group Newspapers. [read post]