Search for: "People v Word" Results 2781 - 2800 of 17,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2018, 6:12 am by Daniel Schwartz
” According to the court, the Plaintiff “perceived that the word “spooks” was used as a derogatory term for Black people, and recalled that her co-workers all turned to look at her when the remark was made. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:18 am
The 9th Circuit blog has an interesting post about a predictable "cop as expert" case (United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:44 am by Susan Brenner
” She remembered words such as “tiny,” “fuck,” and “cunt,” in conjunction with acronyms like “5yoa” and “8yoa. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
In other words, there does not seem to have been any evidence of any customers in England of the plaintiffs’ Paris establishment as opposed to people in England who visited that establishment when they were in Paris (see at p 582). [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As noted in People v Paul, whether a foundation for the experience and training is set forth or not, it seems that, as a matter of fundamental fairness, defendant should not have to proceed to trial in a narcotics case unless and until a laboratory report has been filed by the People. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 6:03 pm
Over the weekend I posted analysis of the Supreme Court's latest ADEA decision, Gross v. [read post]