Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 44,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
And, for that matter, if the Republicans controlled the Senate, and Ted Cruz were President pro tem, would not some people be skeptical about his presiding over Trump’s trial, given the very real possibility that he, like Democrats, could be a Trump rival for the White House in 2024 if Trump is not disqualified after an impeachment conviction? [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:31 pm
Yeah, he was right of center, and yeah, people (including the defendants) did not like that. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
People v Deprospero, 2011 NY Slip Op 8421, 2011 N.Y. [read post]
30 May 2017, 12:26 pm
"You can get from even this brief quote the tenor of Judge Kozinski's concurrence, in which he articulates his view that Congress (and the President) can do pretty much whatever they want to people who want to come to the United States.Reading that quote made me wonder:What would Judge Kozinski's grandfather think of his grandson's concurrence? [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
By Tom Kaufman: Arias v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 8:27 am
We have just learned that Atlantic Recording v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:00 pm
Smith v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm
People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:55 am
""The individual may not have a right to get killed, because the state's interest in protecting people from coercion and abuse is a good one. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 7:02 pm
In the recent juvenile case of F.M. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:38 pm
In the case of People v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 12:25 am
When people – especially political people – start pleading “common sense”, to our suspicious minds it always sounds as if they simply can’t be bothered to conduct a rigorous analysis of their own proposals. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:05 pm
For safety reasons people with children may not want guns around the house. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:37 am
As are other people, apparently, as the lower tribunals go this way and that. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
On 19 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm
"[T]rial counsel's duty of effective assistance includes the responsibility to advise the defendant concerning the exercise of [the] constitutional right" to testify at trial (Brown v Artuz, 124 F3d 73, 74, cert denied 522 US 1128; see People v Carpenter, 52 AD3d 729, lv denied 11 NY3d 830; People v Perry, 266 AD2d 151, 152, lv denied 95 NY2d 856). [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:00 pm
Concepcion, Claims of Corporate Wrongdoing Continue to Pile Up”May 1, 2014 — In the wake of two U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:11 am
People v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
While the “teen” tag may sound problematic and could be a coded reference, 18 and 19 year olds in fact can produce legal pornography. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 2:42 pm
Fifth, unnamed people cannot defend themselves in court. [read post]
