Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 2781 - 2800 of 3,474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm by Alyson Poole (AU)
For example, registration of a trade mark for a clothing brand “John Smith” would be unlikely to succeed, even if John Smith really is the name of the designer. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:12 pm by Jim Walker
In the ship's night club, our cameras spotted people passed out and one passenger face down on the bar. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:12 am by jonathanturley
This year, the Supreme Court delivered a major victory for free speech in 303 Creative v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
But, under reference to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Karakó v Hungary (Application No 39311/05) (unreported), given 28 April 2009, he submitted that article 8 does not confer a right to have your reputation protected from being affected by what other people say. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:24 pm by Alfred Brophy
 And pretty closely related to Thomas Ruffin's State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:39 am by SHG
Further, past Supreme Court cases have presupposed understandings of the technology: In Smith v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Eric W. Orts
Chief Justice Roberts recites the Special Counsel Jack Smith’s allegations but somehow fails to grasp their main meaning. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
In a separate libel claim, the football agent Paolo Vernazza and his ex-wife Sapphira, are suing the People newspaper over a story about Cole and her former husband, Ashley Cole, in a defamation and privacy claim. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
“There already is a rather strong regulation against hacking people’s telephones – the law. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]