Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 2781 - 2800 of 6,178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am by Hannah Smith and Luke Goodrich
Here, Trinity Lutheran was banned from the scrap-tire program solely because it is a religious institution. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am by SHG
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People v… [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am by S
The sole exception appears to be where the applicant is close to dying and there is insufficient care available in the returning country to enable the applicant to die with dignity: N v Secretary of State for Home Department [2005] UKHL 31; [2005] 2 AC 296 and N v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 885. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
More broadly speaking, this case is also a significant step on the long journey of the Metis People towards recognition as unique and rights-bearing aboriginal people, separate and distinct from both the “Indian” (First Nation) and the Inuit peoples, as clearly indicated by s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, and by the recent decisions of the SCC relating to the Metis People (Cunningham, Manitoba Metis Federation and Daniels). [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:13 am by SHG
By any objective measure, the Seventh Circuit’s holdiing in Hively v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:20 pm by Ruth Levush
In his post Tariq discussed the background and findings of Carter v. [read post]