Search for: "S W" Results 2781 - 2800 of 53,843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2023, 12:48 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  I go out of my way never to use the acronym "GOP" to refer to the Republican Party, and I have never (as far as I recall) put the word President in front of the names Donald Trump or George W. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 10:46 am by The Murray Law Firm
” 11Alive.com is reporting, “[w]hen the officers arrived, the police department said they found a 35-year-old who had been shot multiple times. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:02 am by Robert Liles
The Board’s primary jurisdictional authorities[10] are set out below: II. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 7:28 am by The Murray Law Firm
” According to WAPT.com, “[w]hen officers arrived, they found a woman inside a car who had been shot multiple times. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:07 am by James Kraska
O’Connell, e.g., and in the field of the law of naval warfare, Robert W. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
But after it was all over, Langstaff ruled against their petitions in his recommendation to the Middle District of Georgia, and the trial judge, W. [read post]
Hobbs went on to call the situation a “large scale humanitarian crisis that disproportionately affects Arizona’s tribal communities. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:54 am
In re Pioneer IP Interests LLC, Serial No. 88637739 (June 7, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion Judge Thomas W. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:14 am by Chip Merlin
Co., 828 So. 2d 1021, 1025 (Fla. 2002) (‘[W]hen the insurer admits that there is a covered loss, but there is a disagreement on the amount of loss, it is for the appraisers to arrive at the amount to be paid. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by Eugene Volokh
" The ULJ further stated that "[w]hen looking at the totality of the circumstances, Goede's belief that COVID-19 vaccines are not okay to put in her body is a personal belief not rooted in religion. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am by Eugene Volokh
The court concluded otherwise, applying Nebraska's unemployment compensation law, under which "to determine whether an employee is partially or totally ineligible for benefits, one must consider (1) whether there was an act of proven misconduct and (2) whether the misconduct was connected with the employee's work": [W]e have long defined misconduct to include behavior which evidences (1) wanton and willful disregard of the employer's… [read post]