Search for: "STATE v KENNEDY"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 7,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 12:56 pm
Supreme Court decided Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 3:00 pm
But Monday’s argument in POM Wonderful v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:22 am
United States and Overton v. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 4:30 am
Next week the Supreme Court will hear Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 8:06 am
Related Posts: Kennedy v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 4:35 am
” At his eponymous blog, Sheldon Nahmod looks at County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
Dolan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am
” Additional coverage of the solicitor general’s motion in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:25 pm
In the 2005 case of San Remo Hotel v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Kavanaugh has not ruled directly on the validity of Roe v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
The husband argued that Texas state law should control under footnote 10 of Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:35 pm
Justice Kennedy, a dissenter in Green Tree Financial Corp v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 1:01 pm
Walden v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:16 pm
But I suspect that Justice Kennedy, and possibly some of the other conservative justices, might instead point to the ten percent plan as a superior alternative to racially explicit affirmative action policies – thereby incentivizing other state universities to adopt admissions policies that seek racial balancing while pretending to be race-neutral on the surface. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:39 am
The Court’s decision in Janus v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 8:28 am
Court Affirms State’s Revocation of Toledo Clinic’s License Capital Care Network of Toledo v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:42 am
, I think, very intriguing take on the use of animus in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 11:30 am
Dmitry Karshtedt This morning’s argument in Oil States v. [read post]
