Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 2781 - 2800
of 6,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2012, 8:51 am
— Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act, 2011, c. 13 (U.K.). [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 3:03 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 10:10 pm
" Herbko Int'l v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 8:30 am
Six C, the defendant got 1,319 impressions, 35 clicks and zero sales. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
As to the remaining four items that Lacy claimed to have sold, the lack of sales for a [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:09 am
C-4347. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:19 am
Campbell v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:34 am
” Cases applying Partnership Law § 20 (c) (3) hold that sale of a single real estate asset owned by a general partnership would make it impossible to carry on the business of the partnership, causes the partnership’s dissolution by operation of law, and therefore, requires unanimity, lack of which renders the attempted sale “null and void” (Camuso v Brooklyn Portfolio, LLC, 164 AD3d 739 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:36 am
Evid. 801(c), 802. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court case (South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 2:37 am
Alfwear, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 12:16 pm
SK Hynix, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 1:05 pm
See Gresser v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:33 pm
Tilden, his family business of manufacturing and sale of medical cannabis extract as well as the early attempts at branding patent medicines (also known as “nostrums”).CJEU upholds duty to reverse-engineer trade marks in Rubik's cube decision, but what about the actual v abstract test? [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:04 am
Even so, we’re hopeful that in one of the pending lawsuits challenging the program, including EFF’s case Smith v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm
* C-70/10, Scarlet Extended SA v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 3:20 am
(iTVBox.net), 2016 FC 612 aff’d Wesley dba MTLFREETV.com v Bell Canada et al 2017 FCA 55 case in which an interlocutory injunction was granted to restrain the sale of Kodi boxes that were configured to enable members of the public to illegally access streamed content.[1] CarGurus also claimed it’s copying and making the photos available without consent was a fair dealing. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:54 am
Ah, how I wish courts would apply the same scrutiny to trademark harm stories.FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 3:06 am
Merpel says, I still insist that this isn't an intellectual property rights topic - it's all about the appreciation of the value of chattels.Phoney phone covers lead to safe misdirectionR v Thompson is a decision of the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division (Laws LJ, Penry-Davey J and the Recorder of Chester) yesterday, picked up by LexisNexis Butterworth's subscription-only service. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:56 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in Donovan v. [read post]
