Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 2781 - 2800 of 3,989
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2011, 1:30 pm by Simon Lester
 Rather, as the Appellate Body stated, "{i}t depends on the facts of each case. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" Here's the North Carolina Court of Appeals court's analysis, from State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 4:40 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Likewise, if the purchaser refuses to close, the seller can reverse the deal (with the seller becoming the purchaser), but he cannot force the purchaser to buy his interest. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 2:51 am
Although it was really a competition law decision, the ruling of Mr Justice Morgan in Bookmakers' Afternoon Greyhound Services Ltd and others v Amalgamated Racing Ltd and others [2008] EWHC 1978 (Ch), a decision from the Chancery Division, England and Wales last August (noted here by the IPKat) was deemed to be of note to IP lawyers and owners too. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:13 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
Guardian 50/50 Fund V, Ltd., 583 So. 2d 403, 405 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (holding that a TOE clause concerning the closing date did not apply to an alleged delay in the seller’s obligation to clear construction debris); Jackson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:13 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
Guardian 50/50 Fund V, Ltd., 583 So. 2d 403, 405 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (holding that a TOE clause concerning the closing date did not apply to an alleged delay in the seller’s obligation to clear construction debris); Jackson v. [read post]
In another landmark case, Tiffany, Inc. v. eBay Inc., the Second Circuit held that generalized knowledge of infringement was not enough to satisfy the knowledge component of Inwood. [read post]