Search for: "Soling v. New York State"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 3,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2010, 1:03 pm
Smyser ruled that two letters from a New York lawyer amounted to clear violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act because the use of law firm letterhead gave the false impression that a lawyer was working on the case and planning to sue. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:48 am
By contrast, Vila wanted to move the office to New York City and hire a Harvard MBA to put the company on a more aggressive growth plan. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:13 am
At least one policy from a major carrier provides coverage for “any other services approved by the Insurer at the Insurer’s sole discretion”[v]. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
HENRY, Appellants, v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
The only no vote was by Peter Yates of New York. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Sina Drug Corp. v Mohyuddin, 2014 NY Slip Op 07757 [1st Dept Nov. 13, 2014]. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
Nor was relocation authorized in two pre-Hague Convention New York cases. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
During Reconstruction, Democrats bitterly condemned how state equality in the Senate gave disproportionate power to New England states that were far more anti-slavery and racially egalitarian than the rest of the country. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 1:55 pm
From 2003 through 2008, she was treated at the New York University Cancer Center. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 10:23 am
“The critical question, then, is whether the matter affects the public interest in New York, not whether the suit is brought by a consumer or a competitor. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 2:47 pm
In Sarl Louis Feraud International v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:20 pm
(According to the city, “[t]he type [of virus] at issue here, HSV‐1, is present in 60% of American adults and 73% of adults in New York City. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:03 am
The IJ people gave an answer there, and IJ's David Hodges has kindly written it up for me to post: In September, Linda Greenhouse of the New York Timesnoted something "odd" about Espinoza v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:07 pm
Strandburg, New York University School of Law. [read post]
Appellate Decision in Partnership Dispute Clarifies Distinction Between Direct and Derivative Claims
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Eisenberg, 60 AD3d 77 (1st Dept 2009), and the seminal New York case on the subject of the demand requirement, Marx v. [read post]
Appellate Decision in Partnership Dispute Clarifies Distinction Between Direct and Derivative Claims
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Eisenberg, 60 AD3d 77 (1st Dept 2009), and the seminal New York case on the subject of the demand requirement, Marx v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
A New York lawyer has gone to court to unmask an anonymous person who on Google gave him a one-star review that solely said “it was horrible. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 4:38 am
Bevelacqua v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 9:27 am
Enigma claimed that Malwarebytes was engaging in deceptive business practices in violation of New York state law, interfering with business and contractual relations in violation of New York common law and violating the Lanham Act by deceiving Enigma’s potential consumers. [read post]
