Search for: "State v. Davi"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 5,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2021, 3:34 am
Ramos v Goldberg, Schudieri & Lindenberg, P.C. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
University of California Davis Board of Trustees (9th Cir. 2000)]; Yanowitz v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:30 am
Foster of the San Bernardino Superior Court in California issued a three-page minute order granting summary judgment for the plaintiff in Davis v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 3:36 pm
Justice Davis authored the dissenting opinion and stated that the Court’s holding ignored the long-settled Michigan precedent that base fee ownership is capable of cutting off riparian rights. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm
Breyer also announced the judgment and delivered a plurality opinion yesterday in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:38 am
David Davis MP, Tom Watson MP and Others v the Secretary of State for the Home Department Today, the High Court found against the Government in David Davis’s and Tom Watson’s joint legal challenge to the Government’s emergency surveillance legislation. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:26 am
” United States Parole Commission v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:18 am
Davis v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Davis, 499 N.E.2d 1255, 1259 (Ohio Ct. 1985); Pestrak v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:22 pm
United States, 435 U.S. 679 (1978) (ethics restriction on competitive bidding); Goldfarb v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
This was true in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:50 am
In Davis v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm
In the case of Aitken v DPP ([2015] EWHC 1079 (Admin)) the Divisional Court dismissed a former editor’s appeal against a conviction for publishing a story which breached an anonymity order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 10:59 am
The new policy was prompted in part by an investigation by Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights and a report by the California State Auditor.The policy states in relevant parts:H. [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
’”In a similar vein, the Court in Madsen v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court accepted one more case for next term, Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 5:28 am
”The panel drew a distinction between its ruling and a ruling by the Supreme Court last January in United States v. [read post]
