Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 5,194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
”Nintendo v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:49 pm
The costs are too much for all of us to bear. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm
The case is Cruz v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:03 am
The argument here is not that fan fiction is likely to be a good substitute for the original or for any official follow up. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
On PatLit, Stefano Barazza's thoughtful post on the invalidation of a patent for lip and facial synchronisation of animated characters gives us an insight into life in the United States after Alice v CLS Bank revived the old-fashioned notion that patents are for inventive concepts and not for abstract ideas. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
A statute enacted under the State's police power whose effect but not purpose is to curtail the liberty of individuals to live their lives must bear a reasonable relationship, and some proportion to, the alleged public good which justifies the restriction of individual liberty. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
” State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:01 am
Here’s a classic statement of the principle, from Shannon v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:00 pm
So far so good. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 11:00 pm
France, which concerns the issue of transnational continuity of names: in Henry Kismoun v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
Accordingly it's good to learn how others put their cases together, how they deal with jurisdictional and enforcement issues, and how they propose to do so in a world of institutional change.Looking further afield, readers of both this blog and IP Finance will know that there has been an extensive and ongoing debate as to whether patent litigation, and in particular United States patent litigation, has had the effect of depressing patent values, thereby damaging the… [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:45 am
Meyncke v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 11:00 am
STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:28 am
The McGraw-Hill Case Which brings us to last week’s decision by the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department, in Retirement Plan for General Employees v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 11:33 am
” In Heffner v. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 10:41 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm
Power without accountability is never a good thing in a democracy. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 8:59 pm
About 24 hours after denying (except for a minor part) Apple's motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) following the spring 2014 Apple v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 9:37 pm
In the wake of Judge Posner’s opinion on same-sex marriage in Baskin v. [read post]
